"LIQUIDATORS"
September 23, 2000 the judicial processes on the Complaints of the not registered candidates in the deputies of the Chamber of the Representatives of the National assembly of the Republic of Belarus were held in the Supreme court. The judicial sessions reminded a SHOW in a circus than a judicial process. The Supreme court has turned into a helpless body. Behaviour of the judges, their helpless caused pity. It was clear that the courts accepted the obviously illegal decisions. For example:
The businesses of Alexander Vasiliev and Marina Levonevskaya, the applicants in the candidates in the deputies, were united in one business and were considered by one judge simultaneously.
Alexander Vasiliev was refused in the registration as the candidate in the deputies as he, ostensibly, has “hidden” his party-membership. Marina Levonevskaya was refused in the registration as the candidate in the deputies as she, ostensibly, has “hidden” her party-membership and place of work.
In the court it was proved that Marina Levonevskaya and Alexander Vasiliev were never joined the United Civil Party (UCP) according to the Charter of UCP. There are no their applications to join them the numbers of this party, there is no decision of the joint body about the reception them into this party, there is no the registered party structure in Grodno, they never were registered in the party organisation, they were never given out the Party-membership card. The leaders of the party (A. Lebedko and A. Dobrovolsky) consider them to be their members. And the fact that they are not the members of the party is not taken into account by anybody. Vasiliev and Levonevskaya 28 06 2000 said that they left the party to “come unhooked” from the leaders of UCP. But the leaders of UCP are not interested in this fact. They consider them to be the members of the party. The document which says that Levonevskaya and Vasiliev are the members of UCP and which was given by the leaders of UCP played the decisive role in the acceptance of the decision by the court which refused to satisfy the Complaints of these. In other words, the court obliged M. Levonevskaya and A. Vasiliev to be the members of this party.
One more flight of a judicial idea.
Marina Levonevskaya fulfils the duties of the accountant in the public organisation «The Spring of Mercy» on a voluntary basis, she does not get money for this, the labour contract with organisation was not made up.
The court determined that M. Levonevskaya “has hidden” the place of the work. I.e. in the opinion of the court, public obligations are the place of work.
If we take into account how rough and defiant the judge’s behaviour was during the process it became clear that the judge carried out the special order on the final "liquidation" of the candidates in the deputies.
The Supreme court treated Valery Levonevsky, author of these lines not less interestingly. Valery Levonevsky was refused by the selective commission in the registration as he has "concealed" the structure at his dacha when he filled in his declaration. The court was convinced that the real estate and structures Levonevsky does not have. What to do?
The court has accepted the original decision: to refused in the registration as V. Levonevsky has specified the dacha in the declaration (on the demand of the tax body), and it, in opinion of the court, should not be specified. The judge was asked the question: «How is it necessary to fill in the declaration?» The judge truthfully answered: “I do not know".
So. If you specify a dacha – you will be refused in the registration because you has specified, if you do not specify you will be also refused because you has not specified. The circle has become isolated. Even if you honestly fill the declaration you will be not registered all the same. The candidate in the deputies is not registered. It was refused to satisfy the Complaint.
24.09.00 Valery Levonevsky
